DUI First Offense in Oklahoma

This guide explains the penalties and consequences of a first-offense DUI, as well as the potential defenses that may apply to your case.

At Edge Law Firm, our mission is to protect you, ease the stress and anxiety surrounding your DUI charge, and help you regain peace of mind. We are dedicated to achieving the best possible outcome by restoring your freedom, reputation, and dignity without a criminal conviction or record.

Our goal is to help you understand the options available to get your pending DUI charge dismissed, reduced, or acquitted.

Different Types of Impaired Driving in Oklahoma

Oklahoma recognizes several types of impaired driving charges for a first offense, each based on the driver’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC), substance use, or specific circumstances. A standard DUI applies when a driver has a BAC of 0.08% or higher, or is under the influence of alcohol or drugs to the point of being unsafe to drive. An aggravated DUI involves a BAC of 0.15% or higher. Under the new Oklahoma DUI Reform Act, a felony DUI can now apply even to a first offense when aggravating factors are present.

A DUI-Drugs charge applies when controlled substances or intoxicating drugs impair a person’s ability to drive safely, including both illegal substances and misused prescription medications. Driving While Impaired (DWI) is a lesser offense for drivers with a BAC between 0.05% and 0.08%. Actual Physical Control (APC) covers situations where someone is intoxicated and in control of a parked vehicle, even if it isn’t moving. Finally, Underage DUI (Zero Tolerance) makes it illegal for drivers under 21 to operate a vehicle with any measurable alcohol in their system, while a Commercial Driver DUI applies to professional drivers with a BAC of 0.04% or higher, which can result in CDL suspension, disqualification, and job loss.

Oklahoma DUI First Offenses Are Being Charged More Often as Felonies

Oklahoma’s DUI Reform Act has changed how the state handles impaired driving cases, especially for first-time offenders. What used to be treated as a misdemeanor is now often charged as a felony when certain conditions are met.

A first-offense DUI can now result in felony charges if the driver:

• Has a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.15 percent or higher
• Causes an accident involving injury or property damage
• Drives recklessly or dangerously
• Flees from law enforcement
• Has a child under 18 years old in the vehicle

These factors show a higher level of danger and risk, allowing prosecutors to file felony-level charges even for first-time offenders.

Understanding the Consequences of a First Offense DUI in Oklahoma

When someone is arrested for a first-offense DUI in Oklahoma, it can feel overwhelming and stressful. The legal process brings several serious consequences that can affect nearly every part of your life, including your freedom, finances, and ability to drive or work. Understanding what each penalty means can help you make informed choices about how to move forward. The most important decision you can make is to hire a skilled attorney who can defend your case and work to prevent these consequences from becoming part of your life. When a DUI charge is dismissed, reduced, or acquitted, these penalties do not apply. Below is a clear explanation of the most common DUI consequences for a first-offense DUI in Oklahoma.

Misdemeanor DUI – First Offense (No Aggravating Factors)

Applies when there are no injuries, no children in the vehicle, and the BAC is below 0.15 percent.

Possible Penalties Include:

• Jail Time: 10 days to 1 year or more in county jail
• Fines: Up to $1,000 or more
• Court Costs: Several hundred dollars or more
• License Revocation: 180 days or more
• IID / IDAP: Ignition Interlock Device required for 18 months or more
• Probation: 12 to 24 months or more
• Community Service: 20 to 100 hours or more
• ADSAC Completion: Required before license reinstatement
• Victim Impact Panel: Mandatory attendance
• Court-Ordered Terms: May include random alcohol or drug testing, restricted travel, counseling, or restitution

Misdemeanor DUI – With Aggravating Factors in Oklahoma (Effective After November 2, 2025)

• High BAC (Below Felony Threshold):
  The driver’s Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) is above 0.08% (the standard legal limit) but below 0.15% (the new felony threshold).
  A prosecutor may argue that this high-end misdemeanor BAC warrants a tougher sentence than a standard first-time misdemeanor DUI.

• Driving With Impaired Ability:
  The driver’s BAC is below 0.08% (for example, 0.07%) but the officer determines that their ability to drive was impaired by alcohol or another substance.
  The charge may be aggravated by particularly poor driving behavior, such as repeatedly weaving, failure to maintain lane, or near-miss incidents observed by law enforcement.

• DUI While Armed:
  The driver was operating a vehicle under the influence while a firearm or other weapon was present in the vehicle.
  Although not explicitly listed as a DUI-specific aggravating factor in the new DUI statutes, the presence of a weapon is considered a general aggravating circumstance under Oklahoma law and may increase sentencing severity.

• Property Damage (Below Felony Threshold):
  The driver caused property damage during a DUI-related incident, but the amount falls below the felony threshold (commonly cited around $500).
  Even though it does not qualify as a felony, the court may still view the act as reckless behavior, supporting a harsher misdemeanor sentence.

• High Occupant Load:
  The driver was operating the vehicle under the influence with multiple adult passengers onboard.
  This is a non-statutory, discretionary factor that a prosecutor may cite to argue the driver posed a heightened risk to public safety, potentially resulting in an enhanced misdemeanor penalty.

Possible Penalties Include:

• Jail Time: 30 days to 1 year or more in county jail
• Fines: Up to $2,500 or more
• Court Costs: Several hundred dollars or more
• License Revocation: 6 months to 1 year or more
• IID / IDAP: Ignition Interlock Device required for 18 months or more
• Probation: 1 to 2 years or more, often supervised
• Community Service: 40 to 240 hours or more
• ADSAC / Treatment: Required, possibly inpatient or outpatient
• Victim Impact Panel: Mandatory attendance
• Court-Ordered Terms: Random testing, counseling, or restitution for property damage

Felony DUI – First Offense (Under Oklahoma DUI Reform Act)

A first-offense DUI can now be charged as a felony if any of the following are true:

• BAC of 0.15 percent or higher
• Accident involving injury or death
• Child under 18 in the vehicle
• Fleeing law enforcement
• Reckless endangerment or serious property damage

Possible Felony-Level Penalties Include:

• Aggravated DUI (BAC ≥ 0.15%): 1 to 5 years or more in state prison and fines up to $2,500 or more
• DUI with Injury: 1 to 5 years or more in prison and fines up to $5,000 or more
• DUI Manslaughter: 4 years to life or more in prison and fines up to $10,000 or more
• License Revocation: Long-term revocation of 3 years or more
• IID / IDAP: Mandatory ignition interlock device and participation in IDAP before reinstatement
• Probation: Strict supervision, possibly with GPS or alcohol monitoring
• Community Service: 100 to 480 hours or more
• ADSAC / Treatment: Required, often inpatient or long-term outpatient care
• Victim Impact Panel: Mandatory attendance
• Court-Ordered Terms: Restitution to victims, restricted travel, counseling, and regular testing

A felony conviction can permanently affect your future. It can limit employment opportunities, housing options, and professional licensing. Felons also lose their right to own firearms and vote until their sentence and supervision are complete.

Collateral Consequences

A DUI conviction in Oklahoma can have collateral consequences that reach far beyond court penalties. It can affect child custody and divorce proceedings, raise insurance costs, cause job loss, restrict professional licenses, and limit international travel, including entry to Canada and some European countries. Felony convictions can also result in the loss of voting and firearm rights, and if another DUI occurs within ten years, it can be charged as a felony with much harsher penalties and lasting effects.

Taking or Refusing the Breath or Blood Test

When advising clients about Oklahoma’s implied consent law, it is important to explain what it means, what the legal limits are, and how it applies to both breath and blood testing. Under this law, anyone who operates a motor vehicle in Oklahoma is considered to have already given consent to chemical testing, whether a breath or blood test, if they are arrested for suspected DUI. In other words, by choosing to drive, a person has agreed in advance to testing as a condition of having a driver’s license.

Oklahoma law sets the legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit at 0.08 percent for drivers age 21 and older. A BAC of 0.08 percent or higher typically results in a misdemeanor DUI charge for a first offense unless aggravating factors are present. A BAC of 0.15 percent or higher results in an Aggravated DUI, which carries enhanced penalties including mandatory jail time and an Ignition Interlock Device (IID). Even when a driver’s BAC falls between 0.05 percent and 0.08 percent, prosecutors can still pursue a Driving While Impaired (DWI) charge if there is evidence that the person’s ability to drive was affected.

If a client submits to either a breath or blood test and the results are over the legal limit, it is important to emphasize that this does not automatically mean conviction. Test results can be challenged through several defense strategies. Attorneys can question whether the officer had probable cause to make the stop, whether proper testing procedures were followed, or whether the testing equipment was properly maintained and calibrated. Blood tests can also be challenged based on chain of custody issues or lab handling errors. In many cases, even when the reported BAC is high, a skilled attorney can identify procedural or constitutional problems that weaken or exclude the test results entirely.

If a client refuses to take a breath or blood test, the Department of Public Safety (DPS) will begin an administrative process to suspend their driver’s license, typically for a minimum of 180 days for a first offense. However, this suspension can be contested by requesting an Administrative License Revocation (ALR) hearing within 30 days of the arrest. This hearing is an essential opportunity for the attorney to challenge whether the officer had legal grounds for the stop, whether the arrest was lawful, and whether the client was properly informed of their implied consent rights. If successful, the attorney can prevent the suspension entirely. Even if the suspension is upheld, the client may still regain limited driving privileges through the Impaired Driver Accountability Program (IDAP) or by obtaining a restricted license with an IID installed.

The key takeaway for clients is that there is no automatic conviction or permanent loss of driving privileges simply because they took or refused a test. Both choices carry risks but can be strategically defended. A failed breath or blood test can be challenged through procedural, technical, or constitutional arguments, and a refusal can be mitigated through quick administrative action. Acting quickly and retaining an attorney who understands how to navigate both the criminal court process and the DPS administrative system is critical to protecting the client’s record, license, and future.

Taking or Refusing the Field Sobriety Tests

If you took or declined the field sobriety tests, it is important to understand that both choices can still be defended. These roadside tests, such as the walk-and-turn or one-leg stand, are not mandatory under Oklahoma law, and there is no legal penalty for refusing them. Police officers often use them to gather evidence of impairment, but they are highly subjective and can be challenged in court.

Even if you took the tests and performed poorly, that does not automatically prove you were intoxicated. Fatigue, nerves, medical conditions, balance issues, poor lighting, or uneven ground can all affect performance. A skilled attorney can question the officer’s training, how the test was administered, and whether the conditions were fair or consistent with National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standards.

If you refused the tests, that decision cannot be punished with a license suspension or additional criminal charge. In fact, refusing may limit the amount of evidence available to the prosecution. It is also worth noting that these tests are designed to fail, meaning even sober individuals often struggle to perform them correctly under stressful roadside conditions.

Preparation: The Secret to Winning DUI Cases

At The Edge Law Firm, we believe that preparation is the foundation of every successful defense. Evidence is often the key to finding the crack in the prosecution’s armor — and preparation is what reveals it. Our formula for winning is simple: prepare harder, dig deeper, and leave nothing unchecked.

Preparation allows your attorney to conduct a detailed, independent investigation that can expose weaknesses, inconsistencies, and mistakes in the prosecution’s case. By gathering and analyzing all available evidence early, we build a strong defense that can raise reasonable doubt or lead to the suppression of critical evidence. This thorough approach often results in reduced charges, dismissals, or even acquittals.

The side that is best prepared prevails. The Edge Law Firm is known for out-preparing both the police and the prosecution. We take the time to collect key evidence, understand your story, and build the strongest possible defense on your behalf. Our preparation ensures your voice is heard, your rights are protected, and your future is defended.

Common Defenses in DUI Cases

Illegal Stop and Lack of Reasonable Suspicion

A traffic stop is illegal if officers lack reasonable suspicion, which means specific facts suggesting a law was broken, such as swerving or a broken taillight. If the stop was unlawful, all evidence gathered afterward, including field sobriety tests, the arrest, and any statements, may be excluded from court.

Many people believe that if they are pulled over, the police must have had a valid reason to do so. However, that is not always true. Under Oklahoma law, an officer cannot stop a driver based on a hunch or general suspicion. There must be clear and observable facts showing a possible violation. If those facts do not exist, the stop is unconstitutional, and any evidence gathered afterward can be challenged in court.

Imagine you are driving home late at night after a long shift at work. You are following all traffic laws, keeping a steady speed, staying in your lane, and using your turn signals properly. A police officer notices you leaving a parking lot near a bar and decides to pull you over to “check if you have been drinking.”

Since there were no specific facts showing that you broke any laws, such as swerving, speeding, or having a broken taillight, the stop was illegal. After stopping you, the officer asks you to perform field sobriety tests and then gives you a breath test. Because the stop was unlawful, your attorney can file a motion to suppress all evidence gathered after it. If the judge agrees, everything obtained, including the test results, must be excluded.

Without that evidence, the prosecution often has no case left to pursue, which can result in your DUI charge being dismissed and your record staying clean.

No Probable Cause to Arrest

Before arresting someone for DUI, police must have probable cause, meaning solid evidence such as slurred speech, the odor of alcohol, or failed field sobriety tests. Without enough proof, the arrest may be invalid, and any evidence collected afterward can be excluded from court.

Probable cause is a higher standard than reasonable suspicion. While reasonable suspicion allows an officer to make a traffic stop, probable cause is required before an arrest can be made. This means that before placing someone in handcuffs, an officer must have clear, objective signs that the person was actually impaired. If those signs are weak or inconsistent, the arrest can be challenged, and any evidence gathered afterward may be thrown out.

Imagine Sarah is stopped for rolling through a stop sign late at night. During the stop, she politely answers all questions, shows no signs of slurred speech, and there is no odor of alcohol. She explains that she is tired from working a double shift. The officer asks her to step out of the car and perform field sobriety tests on uneven pavement in cold weather. Nervous and shivering, she struggles slightly with balance. Despite having no other signs of impairment, the officer arrests her for DUI.

Since there was no solid evidence of intoxication, such as odor, slurred speech, or reliable test results, her attorney challenges the arrest for lack of probable cause. The judge agrees that the officer’s decision to arrest was based more on assumption than fact. As a result, all evidence collected after the unlawful arrest, including the breath test, is suppressed, and Sarah’s DUI charge is dismissed.

Procedural Violations by Law Enforcement

Officers must follow all legal procedures, including conducting lawful stops, properly giving Miranda and implied-consent warnings, and correctly handling breath or blood tests. Any violation can be grounds to challenge or exclude evidence in a DUI case.

Alex is pulled over for a broken taillight, and it’s pouring rain. The officer quickly handcuffs him without conducting a full investigation and places him in the squad car. While sitting there, Alex admits he “only had one beer” and explains that he would have done the field sobriety tests if it wasn’t raining.

At this point, Alex had not officially been arrested, was not read his Miranda rights, and was not advised of implied consent, even though he was in handcuffs and in custody. His attorney argues that Alex’s statement should be excluded because he was not properly advised of his rights.

The judge agrees and suppresses the statement. With no other strong evidence to support the DUI charge, the case is reduced to reckless driving.

Issues with Chemical Tests (Breath or Blood)

Breath Tests can be unreliable due to poor calibration, operator error, or medical conditions like acid reflux that cause false readings.

Blood Tests can be compromised by improper collection, labeling, storage, or lab handling, which can contaminate samples and invalidate results.

Ed takes a breath test that shows a high blood alcohol concentration (BAC). His attorney discovers that the breathalyzer had not been calibrated in months and that the officer failed to follow proper operating procedures. The court finds the test results unreliable. Because the prosecution cannot prove intoxication beyond a reasonable doubt, the DUI charge is reduced to reckless driving.

Flawed Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs)

These roadside tests are subjective and can be influenced by poor weather, uneven pavement, or medical conditions. Improper instructions or officer bias can also make the results unreliable.

Maria is stopped late at night on a sloped gravel road and asked to perform field sobriety tests. The officer gives unclear instructions, and strong winds make it difficult to balance. Maria loses her footing a few times, and the officer marks her as failing the test. Her attorney later shows that the test conditions were unfair and that the officer did not follow proper training standards. The results are thrown out and she was acquitted of DUI by a jury.

Medical Conditions and Health Factors

Certain conditions like acid reflux, diabetes, neurological issues, fatigue, or anxiety can mimic signs of impairment such as slurred speech, unsteady movement, or bloodshot eyes. Demonstrating these factors can create reasonable doubt and weaken the prosecution’s case.

James, who has diabetes, is stopped after a minor traffic violation. The officer notices a fruity odor on his breath and assumes it is alcohol. In reality, James’s blood sugar is low, which can cause similar symptoms to intoxication. His medical records confirm the condition, and an expert explains that the odor came from ketones, not alcohol. The court rules that the arrest was based on a medical misunderstanding, and the DUI charge is dismissed.

Alternatives to DUI in Oklahoma

When facing a DUI charge in Oklahoma, it’s important to understand that a conviction is not always the only possible outcome. Depending on your record and the specific circumstances of your case, there may be legal alternatives that help you avoid having a DUI permanently on your record. In addition to challenging the DUI charge, certain programs and sentencing options can provide second chances focused on rehabilitation and reform rather than punishment.

These include:

Pretrial Diversion

A pretrial diversion program in Oklahoma offers eligible first-time or low-level offenders a valuable opportunity to avoid a criminal conviction by completing court-approved requirements instead of going through trial and facing sentencing. It provides a genuine second chance for rehabilitation and redemption, but eligibility is limited and determined by the court or prosecutor.

Once accepted, the case is temporarily paused while the participant fulfills required conditions such as alcohol or drug treatment, counseling, community service, or educational classes. Upon successful completion, the charges are dismissed, meaning the individual is not convicted of a crime.

However, the dismissed case may still appear on background checks until the record is sealed through expungement. After expungement, only law enforcement and certain government agencies can access the record. If the participant fails to meet all program requirements, the prosecutor can resume prosecution, and the original charge will appear on the person’s permanent record.

Deferred Sentence for DUI

A deferred sentence offers a genuine opportunity to have a DUI charge dismissed instead of resulting in a conviction.

The process begins when the defendant agrees to plead guilty or no contest to the charge. Rather than immediately entering a judgment of conviction and imposing punishment, the judge postpones final sentencing for a specific period known as the deferral. During this time, the defendant is placed on probation, which typically lasts between one and five years.

Throughout the probation period, the defendant must comply with all court-ordered terms and conditions. In DUI cases, these often include completing DUI school, attending a Victim Impact Panel, undergoing a drug and alcohol assessment and any recommended treatment, performing community service, and paying all court costs and fees. The defendant must also avoid any new criminal charges.

If the defendant successfully completes every requirement, the judge will dismiss the original DUI charge at the end of the term. The case is then closed without a conviction. At that point, the individual becomes eligible for expungement, which seals the record from public access and allows them to legally state they have not been convicted of the offense. If the defendant fails to meet the court’s conditions, the judge may revoke the deferred sentence, accept the original plea, and impose the maximum penalty allowed by law.

The Difference Between Pretrial Diversion and a Deferred Sentence

A deferred sentence means you first plead guilty or no contest, but the judge puts off your punishment while you complete probation. If you violate any of the terms during that time, the judge can find you guilty and give you the full sentence.

A pretrial diversion program happens before you ever plead guilty. The prosecutor agrees to pause your case while you complete treatment, classes, or community service. If you finish everything, your charge is dismissed. If you do not, your case simply continues in court, and you still have the right to fight it.

In simple terms, a deferred sentence is riskier because you have already pled guilty, while a pretrial diversion program is safer because you have not.

Example Case Wins

Unlawful Stop Leads to Full Dismissal of DUI Charges

A client of ours was driving home one evening after eating dinner when he was stopped for allegedly weaving. The officer conducted a brief investigation and arrested him for driving under the influence (DUI). During our initial consultation, information shared by our client raised concerns that the officer may have fabricated the reason for the stop. After obtaining the video evidence and presenting our argument in court, the judge agreed that the stop was unlawful, leading to a full dismissal of all charges against our client.

DUI Charge Dismissed Due to Lack of Probable Cause and Jurisdiction

A client was driving home at night when he was stopped for allegedly weaving and later charged with DUI. During his defense, our team discovered that the arresting officer lacked probable cause for the stop and was acting outside his jurisdiction at the time of the arrest. As a result, the court dismissed the DUI charge in its entirety.

DUI – Not Guilty Verdict at Trial

Our client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI and maintained his innocence from the very beginning. Although he refused to take the state’s breath test, our defense team took the case to trial and presented strong evidence challenging the state’s claims. After careful preparation and cross-examination, the jury returned a not guilty verdict, fully exonerating our client of all charges.

DUI First Offense FAQs

Can My First-Offense DUI Be Sealed or Expunged in Oklahoma?

Yes. If your first offense was dismissed or resulted in acquittal, you can request an expungement immediately. For a first-offense DUI where you received a deferred sentence and successfully completed all court requirements, you may also qualify for expungement. If your first-offense DUI resulted in a misdemeanor conviction with jail time or a suspended sentence, you may be eligible to have it expunged five years after completing your sentence.

Do Most People Get Jail Time for a First Offense DUI in Oklahoma?

Most first-time misdemeanor DUI offenders in Oklahoma do not serve any jail time, and those who do typically serve only a short or minimal sentence. For felony DUIs, however, mandatory minimum sentences of up to 10 days can apply, which is why most people arrested for a felony DUI hire an experienced attorney to challenge the charges and protect their record.

How Long Does a First-Offense DUI Stay on Your Record in Oklahoma?

A DUI conviction stays on your driving record for 10 years and remains on your criminal record permanently unless you receive a deferred sentence and have the record expunged.

Can a First-Offense DUI Be Dismissed or Reduced in Oklahoma?

Yes, a first DUI can sometimes be dismissed or reduced. A skilled attorney may challenge the legality of the stop, the accuracy of testing, or the handling of evidence. In some cases, they can also negotiate a plea to a lesser charge like reckless driving

Schedule a Free, No-Obligation Case Evaluation

The Edge Law Firm offers private, no-obligation consultations for individuals facing DUI charges. During this one-on-one meeting, you’ll speak directly with a member of our experienced defense team to discuss your case, ask questions, and explore your best legal options.

Each consultation typically lasts about an hour and is fully protected under Oklahoma’s attorney-client privilege, ensuring that everything you share remains completely confidential. After reviewing your situation, our team will begin gathering evidence, outlining your defense strategy, and providing a clear quote for legal representation.

To schedule your consultation, complete the form below or call (918) 582-6333.

Please submit our secure contact form below: